It's probably not great for certain use-cases, but in an enterprise environment where you need a lot of power, stability, and performance, and you have a team that has a very strong background in Java, I think it's a great tool for certain jobs. I keep seeing these threads popping up about how awful Java FX is, despite the fact that they don't seem to have used it in any sort of major project. I’ve been thinking how can we use our own icon to become a better player E.g. One of our team managed to port several pieces of functionality over in his spare time to give the head of development an idea of what it would be like. exists,nose,manual,wondering,wise,archives,attract,log,strike,refer,findings,hopes,calendar,collaboration,preferred,expressed,subjects,promoting,charles. Thanks for these definitions, very helpful. The application is way more responsive now, and much easier to optimize (imho) with flight recorder. This was the reason that I suspect swayed it really, the business wanted access to some specific functionality, and we weren't able to provide it without migrating. The player’s statistics are still being fetched from SharkScope’s server. There is simply stuff you cannot do in a browser sandbox, there are certain native APIs particularly related to security that you just don't have access to there. If you encounter a player with this icon, it means that this player has not yet opted in and so, depending on that network’s rules, some individual statistics may not be available for that player. We're a Java shop, we use Java for everything else, so FX really doesn't require learning a lot of new concepts, and having only one language to write in makes it easier to bring people in from outside to quickly pick up the work. We were using backbone/marionette, and in particular, the event bubbling model was an absolute stinker to debug when something went wrong. We all hated using javascript-heavy front-end frameworks.
When my team went to make our business case to migrate our internal call centre web application to FX, we had several reasons: Please share your experience here, why do you use Java for GUI applications ?
#Poker copilot player icon definitions expression software#
I mean don't get me wrong, it just might be that things have changed now, did I miss some major release that made Java GUI ok ?įrom the business side of things, I understand if you want to release your software as soon as possible, writing it once is a huge advantage. So I didn't really bother and just accepted the fact that it sucks, now I see questions popping up here about JavaFX and Swing and that always surprises me why on earth someone would write Java GUI software. ( Yes also your poker co pilot pisses me off ) I think that the only software written in Java that does not piss me off is IntelliJ Idea > 13, they probably optimised the hell out of it. I used quite a lot software written in Java and they all were crap, slow and weird. I never really considered Java for GUI's because it always felt just not right, there were so many glitches and unexpected behaviours that it basically wasn't an option. I like Java a lot, I use it every day but for servers and web applications. 4 GStreamer RTSP People have been doing real-time communication over IP for decades with the protocols WebRTC builds upon WebRTC streamer for V4L2 capture devices, RTSP sources and Screen Capture Github user kylemcdonald reported on webrtc-adapter that the getUserMedia.
0 kommentar(er)
